I. Did the Prosecution Fail to Prove Beyond a
Reasonable Doubt That Valladares Committed First
Degree Murder?

II. Did Trial Counsel Render Ineffective Assistance by
Failing to Investigate and to Present a Trauma
Expert?

III. Did the California Courts' Unreasonable Refusal to
Hold a Federal Evidentiary Hearing, Entitle
Valladares to an Evidentiary Hearing?

IV. Did the Trial Court Deprive Valladares of Due
Process and a Fair Trial by Prejudicially Instructing
the Jury with CALCRIM Nos. 3472 and/or 3474?

V. Did the Trial Court's Failure to Issue a Unanimity
Instruction Deprive Valladares of Due Process and a
Fair Trial?

VI. Did the Trial Court's Refusal to Allow the Jury to
Test Fire the Gun Deprive Valladares of Due Process
and a Fair Trial?

VII. Did the Cumulative Effect of the Errors Render
Valladares' Trial Unfair?

Did the Prosecution Fail to Prove Beyond a Reasonable Doubt That Valladares Committed First Degree Murder?