Because -as admitted by both lower Courts appealled from (wDOK
and 1oth Cir.)i.e., Please see both Federal [and Oklahoma state]
Qrders @ APPENDIX A-D, and as set forth w/ Authority @ WDOC Doc.10:
"Because the fourteen [14] Year difference -where
as it stands now [and Still does] Petitioner was
incarcerated but serving no saeteece-
is significant..." WDOK #CIV. 19.540.J @ Doc. 10
-andBecause:
"In state Court, the trial Judge believed that FLoyd,
540 P.2d 1195 (okla. Crim. App. 1975) did not apply
because Petitioners vacated sentence was of federal
Origin. THIS COURT DOES NOT NECESSARILY READ FLOYD
So NARROwLY. Custard, Custard, id. also @ doc.10.

1)Question Presented: In light above- as factually verified by
B-O-T-H Lower Federal Courts Appealled from [and state Courts]-
Is it possible - in the'United States of America' Today- that in
spite of the Article VI Authority to keep 'United! the united
States of America'-a person who is a United States Citizen
can
"spend fourteen (14) Years in an American Prison "while
it
as
stands now'Sereing No Sentence?' "

2) Question Presented: id., ref Cruel and Unusual Punishments?

3) Question Presented? id., ref Multiple Punishments?

4) Question Presented: id., ref Double Jeopardies?

In Russia?...Perhaps.
In China?...Of Course. -But in the
That Is the only Question before this Court.

Whether a U.S. citizen can serve 14 years in prison without a sentence