No. 21-5155

Michael Wayne Shellito v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2021-07-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review certificate-of-appealability constitutional-claims federal-courts habeas-corpus judicial-discretion postconviction-proceedings standard-of-review
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether the petitioner has demonstrated that jurists of reason could disagree with the federal courts' resolution of his constitutional claims or that such jurists could conclude that the issues presented are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further, thereby entitling petitioner to the issuance of a COA?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner has demonstrated that jurists of reason could disagree with the federal courts' resolution of his constitutional claims or that such jurists could conclude that the issues presented are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further, thereby entitling petitioner to the issuance of a COA?

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-06
Waiver of right of respondent State of Florida to respond filed.
2021-07-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 20, 2021)

Attorneys

Michael Shellito
Martin J. McClainLaw Office of Martin J. McClain, Petitioner
State of Florida
Trisha Meggs PateOffice of the Attorney General Criminal Appeals Division Tallahassee, Respondent