Whether local, state and federal court officers, among which are judges, attorneys, sheriffs, clerks, county recorders and notaries public, should be held accountable for their ongoing continuous criminal conduct of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity ("predicate acts") plus numerous felonies they regularly commit in complete and total violation of:
a. the U. S. Constitution, 14th Amendment, §1 & § 3; and
b. the legal, judicial and ethical codes which the officers of the court(s) swore to uphold.

Whether homeowners ' rights of due process and of equal protection under the law are preempted by the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel, thereby denying owners of residential real estate the right to be heard in a timely manner and in a meaningful way by allowing the parties to use regular litigation proceedings for such complicated legal issues, as contrasted with summary litigation proceedings as originally designed for landlord-tenant cases where the tenant 's ownership of the apartment is not an issue.

Whether Petitioner/Freitas is entitled to offer evidence to support the claims advanced in his First Amended Complaint ("FAC "), especially in light of the void, altered, defective: (a) "Deeds of Trust " and (b)"Trustee 's Deed Upon Sale".

Whether local-state-federal-court-officers should be held accountable for criminal-conduct-through-racketeering