No. 21-5127
Noel Aldana v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: cause-and-prejudice constitutional-review double-jeopardy due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance pro-se procedural-bar strickland-standard strickland-v-washington untimeliness
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does a meritorious claim that a pro se Petitioner raises which clearly
present and meet the cause and prejudice standard addressed in the
Strickland v. Washington ruling overcome the bar of untimeliness?
Does a Double Jeopardy Violation that is on the face of the record and
properly raised on a petition/motion correctable by the honorable Supreme
Court of the United States?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a meritorious claim that a pro se Petitioner raises which clearly present and meet the cause and prejudice standard addressed in the Strickland v. Washington ruling overcome the bar of untimeliness?
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-17
Waiver of right of respondent State of Florida to respond filed.
2021-06-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 16, 2021)
Attorneys
Noel Aldana
Noel Aldana — Petitioner
State of Florida