No. 21-5094

Stanley Jalowiec v. Ohio

Lower Court: Ohio
Docketed: 2021-07-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: caldwell-v-mississippi capital-case capital-punishment constitutional-error death-penalty hurst-v-florida jury-responsibility jury-selection sentencing-responsibility trial-procedure
Key Terms:
Punishment
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)

Is telling the jury that their decision is only a mere recommendation unconstitutional under Hurst v. Florida?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is telling the jury that their decision is only a mere recommendation unconstitutional under Hurst v. Florida?

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-17
Reply of petitioner Stanley Jalowiec filed. (Distributed)
2021-08-05
Brief of respondent State of Ohio in opposition filed.
2021-05-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 12, 2021)

Attorneys

Stanley Jalowiec
Richard A. ClineOhio Public Defender, Petitioner
State of Ohio
Lindsey Colleen PoprockiLorain County Prosecutor's Office, Respondent