No. 21-5064

Brandi Channon and Matthew Channon v. United States

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-07-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-981 criminal-forfeiture forfeiture in-personam in-personam-order joint-and-several-liability joint-liability money-judgment rewards-fraud statutory-forfeiture statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)

1) Does § 981(a)(1)(C) permit the entry of an in personam money judgment in lieu of tainted property?

2) Does § 981(a)(1)(C) permit joint and several liability?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does § 981(a)(1)(C) permit the entry of an in personam money judgment in lieu of tainted property?

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
Main Document
2021-07-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 9, 2021)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Matthew Channon, et al.
Grant Russell Smith — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent