Kevin Antonio Watson v. Virginia
Securities
L. Vjke-tlwi Obfhr -tine m //sA-A/^ s-P
Pku&rafat lb PfoS^ec-U-hcun j as\^ ra-h 4iri €/r> oF''
'. P4< l4 £ouI 4 kat/e-f'kut'id *ffhe_ Vc&afAfaaf^ tfnTSnriitXPfW4L. M/\€- esS-erA'nd ej-eKW-enPs b-^^o/)clo_ CtAS&sz^bliEi,
AaubA fi*r "+k€_ A-kke mP4 fibberV 6^4 S&J& mA
df\ar£ca> <l
ko Whe-ttic/Y Su$£ia-&rf //rbofa Pone c(cm^ lou^noh fk
crlWr ntces^r^ essen+cV-l cXe-\^\arAc^ wTl Irtrsu (4 (n
ci ft
U/kc4l\€/'f Ccit^l 4(4> wd CjTfd'(iol& *M fle. cached
Cv'defies bP fht PfoS'tCU'h&n ujk/ch dXcult^aA^ S -$7CA&Jca\&ap\^A OMaAt £ & ctaSendole^ JqlAoAAILajA
4i^l)beS 4 f60 C^u^P/, Vir.SndKSL Circurk Coo-r4 kco-'e c\
4uW fb ,3 rank feJief r'fWk fPctend Uoo nf"t^ocs>
Ljkm i4 Considers '{rkc, #v?e<rr4s of" AU-e-PeAeircii cUr/W?£v\r
Whether after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the Commonwealth of Virginia proved the essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt for the armed robbery and forcible sodomy charges