1. How Can a legitimate Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied outside the guidelines of the Florida Constitution; Article I, Section 13, Habeas Corpus, U.S. Constitution, Section 9, Clause 2, and Fed. U.S. Law? Whereas, in all, it stipulates that Habeas Corpus is "a matter of right" and "never be suspended unless in cases to which this cause does not pertain"?

2. In the Supreme Court of Florida's engagement in this cause, it used an unspecified case "Baker v. State 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla. July 5, 2004), that basically stereotypes and talks in partisanship in reference to "Petitioner inmates (Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236; 1236) who used writs of habeas corpus to collaterally attack non-capital convictions" (Baker © "Procedural Posture") and, where said the petitions were unauthorized because the proper vehicle for the relief sought was through motions for post conviction relief. Note: there hasn't been an update nor amendment to Law, as this "Baker v. State" is just a case decision that needs to be re-reviewed, but, in this Petitioner's Cause, which is, Accordingly, submitted to strict existing law: F.S. Section 74.01 Application and Writ, Lo. in char support with Article I, Declaration of Rights, Section 13-Habeas Corpus, the Petitioner/Applicant is the word used in the foundations Law when referring to all the Petitioners regardless of their nature or Whereabouts, "vehicle" (Baker ©1236) in which his Petitions [Applicant] rowed Unlawful detainment through Record - State of Florida v. Drummond, *01004343eFl0a, Trial Transcript Page 370, lines 23-25* - Affidavit Evidence in which, could only be effectively sought through F.S. Section 74.01, F.S.A. The Writ of Habeas Corpus, which was recited in this Writ to the Supreme Court of Florida, how does Baker v. State even relate to this Petitions cause?

How Can a legitimate Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied outside the guidelines of the Florida Constitution