1. Judgment is a void judgment if court that rendered judgment lacked jurisdiction of the
subject matter, or of the parties, or acted in a manner inconsistent with due process, (Kiugh v.
U.S., 620 F.Supp. 892 (D.S.C. 1985)")
"A decision produced by fraud upon the court is not in essence a decision at all, and never
becomes final. " Kenner v. C.I.R., 387 F.3d 689 (1968)
"Every constitutional provision is self-executing to the extent that everything done in
violation of it is void. "( Katzberg v. Regents of University of California (2002) 127
Cal.Rptr.2d 482, 29 Cal.4th 300, 58 P.3d 339 .Constitutional Law 640)
Void order which is one entered by court which lacks jurisdiction over parties or subject
matter, or lacks inherent power to enter judgment, or order procured by fraud, can be
attacked at any time, in any court, either directly or collaterally, provided that party is
properly before court. (People ex Rel. Brzica v. Lake Barrington, 268 Ill. App. 3d 420,425,
644 N.E.2d 66 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994))
"Fraud destroys the validity of everything into which it enters, " (Nudd v. Burrows (1875),
91 US 426, 23 Led 286,290)
This case has experienced various forms of void orders, judgment, appealable
orders, and amended judgment. Any of these forms can reverse the void order
and judgment of this case, but the reality is that it has advanced freely, and even
passed California Supreme Court having jurisdiction over the largest judicial
system in the nation. How does the United States Supreme Court ensure the
authority of above published case laws and maintain the uniform of the national
case law?

2. The Illinois Supreme Court held that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the
jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority, -
it had no authority to make that finding." The People v. Brewer, 128 III. 472, 483 (1928).
The judges in the multi-judge corruption ring ignored and did not conduct the trial according
to Labor code §98.2 and 5 claims, and violated the due process of this case. Judgment which is
inconsistent with due process is void, The judgment rendered by judges in multi-judge
corruption ring was void.
Judgment is a void judgment if court that rendered judgment lacked jurisdiction of the subject
matter, or of the parties, or acted in a manner inconsistent with due process, (Kiugh v. U.S., 620
F.Supp. 892 (D.S.C. 1985)"
The labor code §98.2 legal principle and 5 claims, are the due process of this case, which
control the entire process of this case, the trial must be strictly complied with. Multi-judge
corruption ring deliberately acted outside the limit of jurisdiction of labor code 98.2 and 5
claims. The judges have no jurisdiction, no authority to hear and rule, and all decisions made are
void. The defendant and multiple judges claimed that the trial was tried in accordance

Whether a court's judgment is void if it lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter or parties, or acted inconsistently with due process