L V^Ae^NSA m fe/z. |fflturu^dfc, oa Setfewa-I Cicu*r is &>\T )K/lf&f
TbeSt.'bjjo f£ p^Vi d"k<S Siosxl/urcLo f %
^ PeKffesje-r k&s Pfi*> vfdeJL 'fk*t£&ajdrtd?H) aJ( opj4ie,exhibib ar
exfoer dncum&i'k/on fhc& u)ctikL£upf>orihr$ cLu/nsfer relief asrA j
~i'kt£s /fefi <pf c?s3 e<r fuzM ubtn/i' &>J QorjkiJ-vir/tj' dll clccMUv\£nfcs
til'd?pSkmd Sed' 9e>rth i n fi%e* fef/ f/2>n *
ol* Weik&.i'^brs inf#-cfr &'detH&i a-f <£. proSe. prfeoneirs J>u*l pRcc£*S
and f>\refecJri*n £>f r/jA/s Me Shde, Supreme* Coictf ^
fetfK&n m^ndftiss o^A< ^ oiiydlu^ae>bpr^o{ :uj/U^utclesartbIvyj
flbcZ f px^o'f f$ /<h^Ku)<j <#yjLijA/"c/i Tssu&% dire.
U)t H\ ft*1 (U/e*m£, for feJieif ?
0, pe,r$e>r\ IS &-h&*id<*r\&L byh'Z d^&irrysy^ i£ii Ht&n prop&K&t
kts sfekz* ^u// - System fo deny 4'm dtL&p/&ce$tf<jkls /o Sse&
dhd obh/ft ike di~5C&J&ry e f /lfs (?A££^ dsik&y isJould. i ~f
\p£,d!Z, Can adtotjjeZj JiWpifioveAje&jJf/i^ /kti&mJr

Whether the court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for relief