No. 21-5019
Noe Perez v. Renee Baker, Warden, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review certificate-of-appealability constitutional-question fifth-circuit judicial-disagreement nevada-supreme-court ninth-circuit reasonable-jurists seventh-circuit
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Ninth Circuit clearly err when it denied Mr. Perez's request for a COA even though three reasonable jurists on Nevada's highest court already had disagreed about the merits of the issues Mr. Perez wished to raise?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Ninth Circuit clearly err when it denied Mr. Perez's request for a COA even though three reasonable jurists on Nevada's highest court already had disagreed about the merits of the issues Mr. Perez wished to raise?
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-21
Waiver of right of respondent Renee Baker, Warden, et al. to respond filed.
2021-06-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 6, 2021)
Attorneys
Noe Perez
Rick Mula — Federal Public Defender, District of Nevada, Petitioner
Renee Baker, Warden, et al.
Geordan Goebel — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent