1. Under the constitutional provisions and guarantees of the U.S.C.14th Amendment due process and equal application of the law, providing that there are No invidious discriminations between persons or different persons in all courts?

2. IF Judgments of state court of last resort dismisses, without argument or opinion, writ of error from judgment of trial court dismissing, Without conducting hearing or otherwise determining factual issues presented petitions of prisoners containing factual allegations which, if true, show that they are being held in custody in violation of federal constitutional rights, require that case be vacated and remanded to state court for resolution?

3. Can challenges to a courts subject matter jurisdiction be raised at any time obtained outside from convictions the jurisdiction of a court?

4. Are judgments entered null and void when the "allegations"occur outside the boundaries of the state in maritime jurisdiction?

5. When a state District Court of Appeal puts up a Roadblock to Justice by issuing Per Curiam Affirmed (P.C.A) decision which effectively blocks Supreme Court review, after Ruling contrary to State Supreme Court require United States Supreme Court to reverse and remand to the state courts to resolve the conflict and follow the binding law of the state?

6. When a state's decisions are contrary to Federal Constitutional provisions and guarantees cited and established and consistently state law on identical points of law, require that because of due process and equal application of the law guarantees: Supreme Court of united states will not grant writ of certiorari, but, where it appears to court on appeal that state law is applicable rather than federal law, it will vacate judgment and remand cause for enforcement of applicable principles of state law?

7. Under the precedent set forth by this Honorable Court in Hicks v. Oklahoma, 447 U.S 343, 346(1980) are all state courts legally required to follow their own laws and statutes that are constitutionally mandated and protected under the umbrella of the United States Constitution (U.S.C) 14th Amendment equal application of the law?

8. When a Petitioner raises the claim that contrary to federal constitutional rights he stands convicted of an unnoticed uncharged crime, that he did not request and is "Not in list of lesser included offenses", are state courts required to remand to the trial court to address the merits of the claim?

9. Is a conviction based on a known case of perjured and false testimony void under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution and the precedents set forth in: Mooney v. Holohan, 294 U.S. 103, 112 (1935) Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264, at 269 and 272(1959); Giglio v. United States, 408 U.S. 150, 153-154 (1972) and United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 680 (1985)?

10. Is a person held in custody under a state conviction of a crime in Violation of his federal constitutional rights entitled to his day in court for resolution of those issues when the state courts have made No factual Findings on the merits of the claims under this Court's precedent in Jennings v. Illinois, 342 U.S. 104, 110-111 (1951)?

Under the constitutional provisions and guaranties of the 14th Amendment due process and equal application of the law