No. 21-501
James Vincent Liott v. U.S. Bank National Association
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure concise-statement concise-statements-of-errors due-process ejectment ejectment-action legal-errors preliminary-objections standing trial-court-procedure
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-05-12
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the trial court properly rule on Petitioner's Preliminary
Objections to the Ejectment Action;
Answer : NO
The trial court did not consider the Petitioner's Concise Statements
of Errors Complained of on Appeal .
Should the trial court have considered the Petitioner's Concise
Statements of Errors Complained of on Appeal;
Answer : YES
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the trial court properly rule on Petitioner's Preliminary Objections to the Ejectment Action?
Docket Entries
2022-05-16
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-04-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022.
2021-12-17
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-11-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/19/2021.
2021-10-29
Waiver of right of respondent U.S. Bank National Association to respond filed.
2021-03-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 4, 2021)
Attorneys
James Liott
James Liott — Petitioner
U.S. Bank National Association
Leon P. Haller — Purcell Krug & Haller, Respondent