No. 21-5
Solomon Adu-Beniako v. Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-law cdc-guidelines civil-rights constitutional-rights defamation due-process expert-testimony government-liability judicial-review standing substantial-evidence
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw ERISA DueProcess FourthAmendment
AdministrativeLaw ERISA DueProcess FourthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does the Respondent's unfairly tasking, and blaming the Petitioner for the DOJ/DEA responsibility violate the Petitioner's Constitutional rights ?
Whether the Respondent usage of uncorroborated MAP violate the Due process clause ?
Whether the Respondent expert testimony was in violation of Due Process?
Whether CDC guidelines have effect of law?
Whether it is proper for the Court to set aside a judgment if the whole record on file is not reviewed?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Respondent's unfairly tasking, and blaming the Petitioner for the DOJ/DEA responsibility violate the Petitioner's Constitutional rights?
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-25
Waiver of right of respondent Michigan Department of Licensing & Regulatory Affairs to respond filed.
2021-08-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 5, 2021)
Attorneys
Michigan Department of Licensing & Regulatory Affairs
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Solomon Adu-Beniako
Solomon Adu-Beniako — Petitioner