Whether the Nevada Supreme Court, in conflict
with this Court's decision in Walden v. Fiore , 571 U.S.
277 (2014), and with decisions of the Texas Supreme
Court, the Second, Fifth, and Seventh Circuits,correctly held that a State may exercise specificpersonal jurisdiction over a defendant where thedefendant does not live or work in the State, and therelevant conduct occurred overseas, merely because thedefendant "aimed" his conduct at a resident of a Stateand was an officer of a corporation organized in theState?

Whether the Nevada Supreme Court correctly held that a State may exercise specific personal jurisdiction over a defendant where the defendant does not live or work in the State, and the relevant conduct occurred overseas, merely because the defendant 'aimed' his conduct at a resident of a State and was an officer of a corporation organized in the State?