No. 21-492
Edeline Julmisse Prosper, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Junior Prosper v. Anthony Martin
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights excessive-force scott-v-harris section-1983 summary-judgment tolan-v-cotton use-of-force video-evidence
Latest Conference:
2021-10-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Under Scott and Tolan , must courts implement the traditional summary judgment requirement that all evidence be considered in the light most favorable to the nonmovant when the record includes video evidence?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether courts must implement the traditional summary judgment requirement to consider all evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmovant when the record includes video evidence
Docket Entries
2021-11-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-10-05
Waiver of right of respondent Anthony Martin to respond filed.
2021-09-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 3, 2021)
Attorneys
Anthony Martin
Ana Angelica Viciana — Miami-Dade County Attorney's Office, Respondent
Edeline Julmisse Prosper, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Junior Prosper
Court Edward Keeley — Court Keeley, P.A., Petitioner