Whether, in rejecting the detailed factfindings and legal conclusions of a state habeas trial court, disregarding medically accepted standards, and determining based on lay analysis that the petitioner is not intellectually disabled, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals yet again contravened the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments and this Court's precedents.

Whether the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals contravened the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments and this Court's precedents in rejecting a trial court's conclusion that an individual is intellectually disabled and therefore may not be put to death by the state