Does the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine apply to two incomplete, illegal proposed State Court Rulings produced by a former Associate Judge who failed to obtain a sign-off of his rulings from the Judge of Record within 30 days of their creation, as required by State Law?

Per four Texas Statutes, written at the level a fifth grader can comprehend, the Court is required to have signed off on the Orders. Two of these Statutes require the sign off within 30 days.

After 7 years of "fumbling", in 2020 Texas State Court System finally and formally ruled that the unsigned proposed Peyton Jr. Orders were never final state rulings, are not now final State rulings, and confirmed that they can never be made final State Orders.

The Rooker Feldman Doctrine is crystal clear that it can only be applied to FINAL State Orders. In fact the 7 year burden of illegal incomplete State Orders placed on me by Peyton Jr. actually represents a violation of my Civil Rights.

The sole issue for this court to consider is "Can the Rooker Feldman Doctrine" be applied to two incomplete illegal proposed instruments that are not and cannot be made into FINAL State Orders.

Does the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine apply to two incomplete, illegal proposed State Court Rulings