No. 21-453
Uber Technologies, Inc., et al. v. Johnathon Gregg
Tags: california-labor-code contract-law federal-arbitration-act individual-arbitration ninth-circuit paga-claims preemption supreme-court-precedent
Latest Conference:
2022-06-23
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether agreements calling for individual arbitration are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act with respect to claims asserted under the California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether agreements calling for individual arbitration are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act with respect to claims asserted under the California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act
Docket Entries
2022-07-29
JUDGMENT ISSUED
2022-06-27
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana, 596 U. S. ___ (2022).
2022-06-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.
2022-01-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-12
Letter from petitioners dated January 12, 2022 filed in reply to the response to the petition for certiorari.
2022-01-10
Response to petition from respondent Johnathon Gregg filed.
2021-12-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 10, 2022.
2021-12-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 10, 2021 to January 10, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-11-10
Response Requested. (Due December 10, 2021)
2021-11-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-10-25
Brief amicus curiae of the Retail Litigation Center, Inc. filed.
2021-09-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 25, 2021)
Attorneys
Johnathon Gregg
Jahan Crawford Reza Sagafi — Outten & Golden, LLP, Respondent
The Retail Litigation Center, Inc.
Eric F. Citron — Goldstein & Russell, P.C., Amicus
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Theane Evangelis Kapur — Gibson, Dunn &Crutcher LLP, Petitioner