No. 21-451
Oklahoma v. Shawn Thomas Jones
Tags: civil-rights criminal-jurisdiction due-process indian-country mcgirt-precedent mcgirt-v-oklahoma non-indian-prosecution state-authority tribal-sovereignty
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-06-29
(distributed 4 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether a State has authority to prosecute non-Indians who commit crimes against Indians in Indian country.
2. Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a State has authority to prosecute non-Indians who commit crimes against Indians in Indian country
Docket Entries
2022-08-01
JUDGMENT ISSUED
2022-08-01
MANDATE ISSUED
2022-06-30
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2022-06-30
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>Oklahoma</i> v. <i>Castro-Huerta</i>, 597 U. S. ___ (2022).
2022-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2022.
2022-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2022-01-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2021-12-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-18
Reply of petitioner Oklahoma filed.
2021-11-05
Brief of respondent Shawn T. Jones in opposition filed.
2021-11-05
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Shawn T. Jones.
2021-10-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 24, 2021.
2021-10-25
Brief amicus curiae of Chickasaw Nation filed.
2021-10-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 25, 2021 to November 24, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-09-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 25, 2021)
Attorneys
Chickasaw Nation
Oklahoma
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Petitioner
Shawn T. Jones
Zachary Charles Schauf — Jenner & Block, LLP, Respondent