No. 21-449
Bilal Abdul Kareem v. William J. Burns, Director, Central Intelligence Agency, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights d-c-circuit due-process government-media government-transparency judicial-notice online-publication standing sua-sponte technology
Latest Conference:
2021-11-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER THE D.C. CIRCUIT'S DECISION TO DISMISS THE CASE BASED ON DISPUTED FACTS NOTICED SUA SPONTE AND WITHOUT DUE PROCESS WAS IMPROPER.
WHETHER THE LACK OF GUIDANCE FROM THIS COURT HAS RESULTED IN CONFUSION ABOUT APPROPRIATE SCOPE OF JUDICIAL NOTICE AS TO THE TRUTH OF FACTS CONTAINED IN ONLINE MEDIA PUBLISHED BY THE GOVERNMENT.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the D.C. Circuit's decision to dismiss the case based on disputed facts noticed sua sponte and without due process was improper
Docket Entries
2021-11-15
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/12/2021.
2021-10-25
Waiver of right of respondent Burns, William J., et al. to respond filed.
2021-09-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 25, 2021)
Attorneys
Bilal Abdul Kareem
Eric Leslie Lewis — Lewis Baach Kaufmann Middlemiss PLLC, Petitioner
Burns, William J., et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent