HAS FOR GOING ON 25 YEARS HELD PET- WHETHER THE U.S./ KANSAS ,
ITIONER ILLEGALLY IN PRISON CONTRARY TO THE FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF THEI.
UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION ON A VOID JUDGMENT THAT IS REPUGNANT TO
THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT & FIFTH AMENDMENT DUE PROCESS CLAUSES?

I. KANSAS,' ILLEGALLY DEPRIVED PETITIONER OF
LIBERTY FOR 25 YEARS BY INDIRECTLY SUSPENDING THE WRIT THROUGH AN
ABUSE OF JUDICIAL DISCRETION AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IN VIOLAT-
OF U.S.C.A. ARTICLE 1 § 9?

II. WHETHER THE U.S.
9
U.S. / Kansas, ACTED IN A MANNER THAT IS REPUG- WHETHER THE III.
NANT TO THE U.S.C.A SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO FAIR NOTICE BEFORE
DEPRIVE PETITIONER OF LIBERTY IN COMPLIANCE WITH DUE PROCESS &
EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW PURSUANT TO THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT
OF THE UNITED STATES CONTITUTION & KANSAS OWN CONSTITUTIONAL BILL
OF RIGHTS § 1 OTH AMENDMENT?

WHETHER THE STATE OFFICIALS ABUSE OF JUDICIAL DISCRETION &
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE THAT HAS RESULTED IN PETITIONERS UNLAWFUL
INCARCERATION FOR 25 YEARS ON THE VOID JUDGMENT WARRANTS THE ISr
SUANCE OF THE UNCONDITIONAL

Whether the U.S./Kansas has held petitioner illegally in prison contrary to the U.S. Constitution