No. 21-431

Grant Lloyd Greenwood v. Minnesota

Lower Court: Minnesota
Docketed: 2021-09-21
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel fourteenth-amendment jury-instruction jury-instructions prosecutorial-misconduct sixth-amendment
Latest Conference: 2021-10-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

The question presented by this petition is whether
a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of appellate counsel, and Fourteenth Amendment right to due process, are violated when:
1.
A prosecutor requests a jury instruction that
omits an essential element of the crime
charged;
2.
The prosecutor argues in summation for a
conviction consistent with the omission of the
essential element of the crime charged;
3.
The trial court provides a jury instruction
that omits the essential element of the crime
charged;
4.
The defendant's trial counsel fails to object
to any of the foregoing;
5.
The defendant is convicted of the crime
charged; and
6.
The defendant's appellate counsel on direct
appeal fails to raise the issue as a basis for
reversal on the defendant's behalf.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of appellate counsel, and Fourteenth Amendment right to due process, are violated

Docket Entries

2021-11-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-10-04
Waiver of right of respondent State of Minnesota to respond filed.
2021-09-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 21, 2021)

Attorneys

State of Minnesota
Kelsey Rae KelleyAnoka County Attorney's Office, Respondent