Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether basing Article III standing to seek damages on a mere risk of harm, without evidence that the harm ever materialized, is inconsistent with this Court's holding just a few months later in TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez.
2. Whether purchasing a product or service automatically creates a "financial injury" cognizable under Article III, even if the product or service provided precisely the benefit the consumer bargained for.
3. Whether a class can be certified (or remain certified) when many class members suffered no Article III injury.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether basing Article III standing to seek damages on a mere risk of harm, without evidence that the harm ever materialized
2022-01-10
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>TransUnion LLC</i> v. <i>Ramirez</i>, 594 U. S. ___ (2021).
2021-12-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-22
Reply of petitioners Rocket Mortgage, LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2021-12-08
Brief of respondents Phillip Alig, et al. in opposition filed.
2021-11-12
Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.
2021-10-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 8, 2021.
2021-10-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 12, 2021 to December 8, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-10-12
Response Requested. (Due November 12, 2021)
2021-10-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-09-28
Waiver of right of respondent Phillip Alig, et al. to respond filed.
2021-09-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 21, 2021)