No. 21-427
William Frederick Lamoureux v. Montana
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-law content-based-restriction criminal-law due-process first-amendment free-speech overbreadth overbreadth-doctrine speech-regulation
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment Privacy
FirstAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference:
2022-01-14
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a statute that criminalizes speech intended to annoy or offend is unconstitutionally overbroad under the First Amendment.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a statute that criminalizes speech intended to annoy or offend is unconstitutionally overbroad under the First Amendment
Docket Entries
2022-01-18
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2021-12-28
Reply of petitioner William Frederick Lamoureux filed. (Distributed)
2021-12-15
Brief of respondent Montana in opposition filed.
2021-11-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 15, 2021.
2021-11-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 15, 2021 to December 15, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-10-14
Response Requested. (Due November 15, 2021)
2021-10-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-10-07
Waiver of right of respondent Montana to respond filed.
2021-09-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 21, 2021)
Attorneys
Montana
David Morgan Steven Dewhirst — Office of the Solicitor General, Respondent
William Frederick Lamoureux
Fred Anthony Rowley Jr. — Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Petitioner