No. 21-403
Bruce H. Zitka, et ux. v. Michigan
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights court-order criminal-procedure due-process entrapment-by-estoppel government-liability governmental-officials jury-trial legal-defense res-judicata
Latest Conference:
2021-10-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
Were the Zitkas denied the right to present evidence to show the jury a prior court order authorized their conduct and to show they acted as they did because governmental officials told them it was legal?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Were the Zitkas denied the right to present evidence to show the jury a prior court order authorized their conduct and to show they acted as they did because governmental officials told them it was legal?
Docket Entries
2021-10-18
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/15/2021.
2021-09-20
Waiver of right of respondent State of Michigan to respond filed.
2021-08-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 14, 2021)
Attorneys
Bruce H. Zitka, et al.
Ronald Dino Ambrose — Attorney-at-Law, Petitioner
State of Michigan
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent