No. 21-396
Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Dev Anand Oman, et al.
Tags: airline-deregulation-act commerce-clause extraterritorial-regulation interstate-commerce multi-state-work-shifts transportation-workers wage-and-hour-laws
Key Terms:
Arbitration WageAndHour
Arbitration WageAndHour
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether, consistent with the Commerce Clause and the deregulatory preferences of the Airline Deregulation Act, California may extend its wage-and-hour laws to flight attendants who spend the vast majority of their workweek outside of California simply because they report to a California airport to begin their multi-day, multi-state work shift.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether California may extend its wage-and-hour laws to flight attendants who spend the vast majority of their workweek outside of California
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-30
Reply of petitioner Delta Air Lines, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
2021-11-12
Brief of respondents Dev Anand Oman, et al. in opposition filed.
2021-09-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 12, 2021.
2021-09-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 13, 2021 to November 12, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-09-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 13, 2021)
Attorneys
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
Paul D. Clement — Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Petitioner
Dev Anand Oman, et al.
Matthew Carl Helland — Nichols Kaster LLP, Respondent