No. 21-363

Wendy Marie Meigs v. Trey Bergman, et al.

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2021-09-08
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: abuse alternative-dispute-resolution court-ordered-mediation courtroom-guidelines family-court judicial-process manipulation mediation mediation-liability pro-se-representation victim-protection vulnerable-victim
Latest Conference: 2021-11-12
Question Presented (from Petition)

Should a mediation, family court-ordered or not, follow normal courtroom guidelines as courts defer court functions to mediation which creates the expectations of participants that mediation will run under the same protections and guidelines of a regular courtroom? Should mediation participants and mediator be held liable for allowing the abuse and manipulation of a vulnerable-victim? (Murphy, 2021 ){United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Jeffrey L. Goldberg, Defendant-appellant, 406 F.3d 891 (7th Cir. 2005).

Should individuals be allowed to represent themselves in court, especially against educated, trained, and highly-skilled lawyers? (If the institution of justice continues to allow individuals to represent themselves, then the institution is geared against the self-litigant, pro-se).

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should mediation participants and mediator be liable for abuse and manipulation of a vulnerable victim?

Docket Entries

2021-11-15
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/12/2021.
2021-10-27
Reply of petitioner Wendy M. Meigs filed. (Distributed)
2021-10-08
Brief of respondents Trey Bergman, et al. in opposition filed.
2021-09-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 8, 2021)

Attorneys

Trey Bergman, et al.
Diana L. FaustCooper & Scully, P.C., Respondent
Wendy M. Meigs
Wendy Marie Meigs — Petitioner