(A) Issue 1: Whether Appellate review of a grant of summary judgment was de novo , (Judicial Watch, finely. rflep 'tfofD?f.-, M3 F.3d 1106, 1110't&.C !' tJir *."2019)); and whether, in such review, the Court of Appeals "examine [d] the . facts iri; the, record -and all _reasonable inferences derived' there from In' a light most ' ' favorable to' the ; nbri-movirig paxty/ Fe/S b., Fireman 's Fund Ins. Co., 909 F.3d 11.86,'1193 ^(D.C. Cir, 2018 ); ^; :t".

(B) Issue"" 2: Is a court obligated to' treat the Federal Tort Claims Act 's statute ofi limitations as running while the veteran . . remains under the .exclusive, control and.,care * .. of" the* VA ' to correct '."Ms': ''debilitating and traumatizing electrocution injury thus allowing; the VA to'beriefit from i£s illegal ;V. and/or immoral behavior. 0.

(C) isfue 3Vwhetherat.wa£^oiation b^proceSirai k: Fifth ^rid^t;|& theVDisfricjf Court - to' prevent Petitioner from dbpdsmg and doing other forms of!discovery on id ^ose^d«^aM.^& were, in fact, relied upon the* Distinct'Court in granting the Motion for SummaryT , , > ' u:.hsz-xC wL.c:'': riJudgment.in.*: an

Whether Appellate review of a grant of summary judgment was de novo