No. 21-360

Joseph Constant v. DTE Electric Company, aka DTE Energy, aka Detroit Edison Company, aka DTE, et al.

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-09-08
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Relisted (2)
Tags: civil-rights contract-conspiracy fraud-on-the-court fraud-upon-court judicial-ethics judicial-immunity judicial-misconduct rico rico-act
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

I Did Judge Kumar and the Executives of the Judges' RICO Enterprise made frauds upon the court when1. They litigated cases for DTE under the DTE-to-Enterprise PO A32211400 between 2/5/2013 and 6/21/2021,
2. They furthered the specialized 2013 conspiracy and contract between DTE, Judge Kumar and the Enterprise to defraud the courts for court orders, which DTE would otherwise, not have been able to obtain by law, facts and evidence,
3. They violated Canon 4(H) of the Michigan code of Judicial conduct, the RICO Act and my civil rights?

II Can Res judicata, the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine and Judicial immunity bar and dismiss my complaints, when their elements have not been met?

III Does The Supreme court's rules 10(a), (b), (c) provides strong and compelling reasons for Grant of this Petition?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did Judge Kumar and the Executives of the Judges' RICO Enterprise made frauds upon the court

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-12-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-30
2021-11-08
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/5/2021.
2021-08-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 8, 2021)

Attorneys

Deborah A. Servitto, Jane M. Beckering, and Karen M. Fort Hood
Fadwa A. HammoudMichigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Joseph Constant
Joseph Constant — Petitioner