No. 21-355
Tags: bar-admission bar-discipline client-interests constitutional-rights counsel-of-choice disciplinary-proceeding due-process legal-ethics presumption-of-innocence right-to-counsel
Latest Conference:
2021-11-05
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Did the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ("Eleventh Circuit") err by denying Larry Klayman, Esq. ("Mr. Klayman") admission pending the outcome of a bar disciplinary proceeding in the District of Columbia, thereby presuming him guilty until proven innocent and severely harming the interest of his clients?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Eleventh Circuit err in denying admission pending a disciplinary proceeding, presuming guilt and harming client interests?
Docket Entries
2021-11-08
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/5/2021.
2021-08-31
Attorneys
Larry Klayman
Larry Elliot Klayman — Klayman Law Group, P.A., Petitioner