No. 21-318

Mark Leyse v. Bank of America, National Association

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2021-09-01
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: article-iii-standing congress-lawmaking-authority congressional-intent consumer-protection intangible-harms spokeo-v-robins statutory-harm telemarketing-regulation telephone-consumer-protection-act unsolicited-telemarketing
Key Terms:
Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)

The text of the Telephone Consumer Protection
Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227 ("TCPA"), demonstrates
Congress's determination that certain types of
unsolicited telemarketing calls are inherently a
nuisance and are harmful within the meaning of
Article III of the Constitution. The question is whether
Congress, which, as the branch charged with
lawmaking, "is well positioned to identify intangible
harms that meet minimum Article III requirements,"
such that its judgment is "instructive and important,"
Spokeo v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540, 1549 (2016), is to
have its judgment respected with regard to the TCPA's
prohibition against the placing of unsolicited pre-recorded telephone calls to residential telephone lines.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

whether-congress-has-authority-to-identify-intangible-harms-under-article-iii

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-09-02
Waiver of right of respondent Bank of America, National Association to respond filed.
2021-08-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 1, 2021)

Attorneys

Bank of America, National Association
Joseph Russell PalmoreMorrison & Foerster LLP, Respondent
Mark Leyse
Daniel Adam OsbornOsborn Law PC, Petitioner