1. Did the Supreme Court err in failing to rule that the exclusion of
Petitioner and his counsel from an ex parte hearing violated
Petitioner's rights to be personally present, to counsel at all stages
of the Proceedings and to due process of law?

2. Did the Supreme Court err in failing to rule that the order
preventing defense counsel from revealing to Petitioner the
existence of a statement obtained from Kendrick Riley pursuant
to P.C. 1054.7 violated Petitioner's rights to a fair trial, to present
a defense and to due process of law?

3. Should the Supreme Court have determined that trial counsel
was ineffective by failing to object to inadmissible evidence about
uncharged crimes, in violation of Petitioner's' rights to a jury trial,
to counsel, and to due process of law?

Did the Supreme Court err in failing to rule that the exclusion of Petitioner and his counsel from an ex parte hearing violated Petitioner's rights to be personally present, to counsel at all stages of the Proceedings and to due process of law?