No. 21-300
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-crisis due-process medical-experiment national-security public-health scientific-control-group standing standing-doctrine vaccine-injury vaccine-mandates
Latest Conference:
2021-10-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. On a Rule 12(b) dismissal motion, did the District Court commit clear and indisputable error by abruptly dismissing this national security case on the pretense that Healthiest Americans' verified specific allegations that have established standing had not been made at all?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court committed clear and indisputable error by dismissing this national security case on standing grounds despite the petitioners' verified allegations establishing standing
Docket Entries
2021-11-01
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Institute for Health Research GRANTED.
2021-11-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-09-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-09-29
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Institute for Health Research. (Docketed Oct. 28, 2021)(Distributed)
2021-08-30
Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due September 29, 2021)
Attorneys
Institute for Health Research
Lowell H. Becraft Jr. — D., Amicus
Joy Garner, et al.
Gregory James Glaser — Greg Glaser, Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent