Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the dormant commerce clause may be used to invalidate the application of a state's neutral, non-discriminatory tolling statute to defeat the enforcement of a former resident's stipulated judgment where there is no showing of any burden on or discrimination against interstate commerce.
2. Whether the dormant commerce clause applies to a state statute with no intended or demonstrated effect on interstate commerce.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the dormant commerce clause may be used to invalidate the application of a state's neutral, non-discriminatory tolling statute to defeat the enforcement of a former resident's stipulated judgment where there is no showing of any burden on or discrimination against interstate commerce
2022-02-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2022-01-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2022-01-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/10/2021.
2021-11-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-11-10
Reply of petitioner Arrow Highway Steel, Inc. filed.
2021-10-27
Brief of respondent Robert Dubin in opposition filed.
2021-09-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 29, 2021.
2021-09-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 29, 2021 to October 29, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-08-30
Response Requested. (Due September 29, 2021)
2021-08-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-28
Waiver of right of respondent Robert Dubin to respond filed.
2021-07-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 9, 2021)