1. How can panels of Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirm decisions as matters of law, that are in direct conflict with previously established binding Precedents of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals; and Precedents established by the United States Supreme Court?

2. Should the petitioner have been granted a judgment of Acquittal by the District Court?

3. Should the petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion have been granted by the District Court?

4. Should the Trial Judge have recused himself from presiding over the petitioner's trial?

5. Should the petitioner have been granted a Certificate of Appealability by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals?

how-can-panels-of-ninth-circuit-court-of-appeals-affirm-decisions-as-matters-of-law-that-are-in-direct-conflict-with-previously-established-binding-precedents