No. 21-22

Bo Peng v. F.M. Tarbell Co.

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2021-07-08
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process fraud-on-the-court judicial-bias judicial-corruption judicial-independence jury-trial legal-misconduct rule-of-law standing
Latest Conference: 2021-12-03 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

The value of this case is over tens of millions of dollars. Defendant obtained huge amount of illegal proceeds through illegal business pattern: wage theft, wrongful termination, willful misclassification. Defendant used the large amount of illegal proceeds, to purchase judicial decision in favor of defendant, to influence and corrupt judges in the judicial system, and to form a multi-judge corruption ring.

Facing the emergence of the reality of the multi-judge corruption ring, how does U.S. Supreme Court severely punish business who obtained huge illegal gains through illegal business pattern and stop the formation and spread of the multi-judge corruption ring?

How can U.S. Supreme Court make "Every constitutional provision is self-executing to the extent that everything done in violation of it is void. " into reality?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Judicial corruption

Docket Entries

2021-12-06
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-11-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-10-26
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-31
Waiver of right of respondent F.M. Tarbell Co. to respond filed.
2021-06-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 9, 2021)

Attorneys

Bo Peng
Bo Peng — Petitioner
F.M. Tarbell Co.
Benjamin K. GriffinGriffin, P.C., Respondent