In Carpenter v United States, No. 16-402, 585 U. S. _ (2018), this court held that the Government 's acquisition of Carpenters cell-site records was a Fourth Amendment search.

In Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014), this court held that police generally may not, without a warrant search digital information on a cell phone Seized from an indi vidual who has been arrested.

In Katz v United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967), this court held that The Fourth Amendment 's protection from unreasonable search and seizure extends to any area where a person expects has a. "reasonable expectation ofprivacy. "

In Florida v Jardines, 11 -564, 569 U.S. 1 (2013) this court held that the Governments use of a trained police dog to investigate the home and its immediate surroundings, is a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.

In Marbury v. Madison , 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803), this court has stated that the Constitution must always take precedence in any conflict between it and a law passed by Congress.

What constitutes a Fourth Amendment violation? Does the absence of a crime or arrest void the violation of a civil right?

Does a Petitioner need to be charged with a crime and arrested for him to have Locus Standi when petitioner has satisfied the three requirements of Standing when he suffered direct injury when he lost his job and suffered emotional distress thru:actions qf respondents, and where this court has already addressed the issue of redressability in Bivens, 42 U.S.G. § 1983, and 42 U.S.C. § 1985.

Does a Petitioner need to be charged with a crime and arrested for him to have Locus Standi