No. 21-1589
Henry McInnis v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: circuit-split false-claims first-amendment fraud hospice-fraud medical-certification regulatory-liability social-security-act
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the lower court err in finding pervasive fraud as to "false" hospice certifications —following the Third Circuit as opposed to the Eleventh Circuit —thereby expanding regulatory liability contrary to the Social Security Act and First Amendment?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the lower court err in finding pervasive fraud as to 'false' hospice
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-06-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 25, 2022)
Attorneys
Henry McInnis
Cooke Wilson Kelsey — Parker & Sanchez PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent