No. 21-1571

Rozalyn Ragan, Personal Representative of the Estate of Charles Phillip Ragan, Deceased v. Melissa Ragan, aka Melissa Hudson

Lower Court: Colorado
Docketed: 2022-06-17
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response RequestedRelisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: after an ERISA plan administrator has fully distr ERISA preempts a claimant's state-law right to th beneficiary-rights benefit-distribution distribution distribution-dispute erisa ERISA-preemption federal-court-jurisdiction life-insurance life-insurance-proceeds plan-administrator preemption state-law state-law-claim
Latest Conference: 2023-01-06 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

In Kennedy v. Plan Administrator for DuPont
Savings & Investment Plan, 555 U.S. 285 (2009), this
Court held that ERISA foreclosed a claim against a plan
administrator seeking to force the administrator to pay
out benefits to someone other than the beneficiary named
in the plan documents. In the course of that decision,
however, this Court expressly declined to decide whether
a party "could have brought an action in state or federal
court against [the named beneficiary] to obtain the
benefits after they were distributed." /d. at 300 n.10. Since
Kennedy, federal and state courts have split over whether
ERISA preempts a state-law claim brought to recover
proceeds that have already been distributed. In this case,
the Colorado court of appeals deepened the split by
holding that a post-distribution claim is preempted under
ERISA's express-preemption clause.

The question presented is: Whether, after an
ERISA plan administrator has fully distributed life
insurance plan proceeds, ERISA preempts a claimant's
state-law right to those proceeds.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether ERISA preempts a state-law claim to recover life insurance plan proceeds after distribution

Docket Entries

2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-23
Reply of petitioner Rozalyn Ragan, Personal Representative of the Estate of Charles Phillip Ragan, Deceased filed.
2022-11-10
Brief of respondent Melissa Ragan, aka Melissa Hudson in opposition filed.
2022-10-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 10, 2022.
2022-10-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 11, 2022 to November 10, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-08-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 11, 2022. See Rule 30.1.
2022-08-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 8, 2022 to October 10, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-08-09
Response Requested. (Due September 8, 2022)
2022-08-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 18, 2022)
2022-06-06
Application (21A689) denied by Justice Gorsuch.
2022-06-01
Application (21A689) to extend further the time from June 15, 2022 to June 22, 2022, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.
2022-05-05
Application (21A689) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until June 15, 2022.
2022-05-02
Application (21A689) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 15, 2022 to July 14, 2022, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.

Attorneys

Melissa Ragan, aka Melissa Hudson
Shay DvoretzkySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Respondent
Kenneth H. GrayGasper Law Group, PLLC, Respondent
Rozalyn Ragan, Personal Representative of the Estate of Charles Phillip Ragan, Deceased
Matthew W.H. WesslerGupta Wessler PLLC, Petitioner