1. Does it violate constitutional due process when a worker is dispossessed by the state of a property right to unemployment benefits on a charge of "misconduct connected to the work " when the only issue the employer contended was "voluntary leaving " and "there were no other issues disputed by the Appellant employer?

2) Is a "stacked " "Notice of Appeal of a Telephone Hearing " [ which sets the issues to be raised for the employer

Does the deprivation of unemployment benefits based on a charge of 'misconduct connected to the work' when the only issue the employer disputed was 'voluntary leaving' violate due process?