No. 21-1545

Allen Whitaker v. District of Columbia Concealed Pistol Licensing Review Board

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2022-06-09
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 2nd-amendment administrative-law appellate-procedure civil-rights constitutional-vagueness due-process gun-rights license-revocation standing vagueness
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Can the government render moot a fully
briefed appeal challenging the denial of a license to
carry a pistol by granting the license — though not confessing error — when the license must later be renewed
under the same assertedly illegal standard?

2. Is a regulation that disqualifies applicants for
gun licenses who have exhibited an undefined "propensity for violence or instability" unconstitutionally
vague?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can the government render moot a fully briefed appeal challenging the denial of a license to carry a pistol by granting the license — though not confessing error — when the license must later be renewed under the same assertedly illegal standard?

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-21
Waiver of right of respondent D.C. Concealed Pistol Licensing Review Board to respond filed.
2022-06-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 11, 2022)

Attorneys

Allen Whitaker
Leslie Sue McAdoo GordonMcAdoo Gordon & Associates, P.C., Petitioner
D.C. Concealed Pistol Licensing Review Board
Caroline Sage Van ZileOffice of the Attorney General for D.C., Respondent