No. 21-1536
Arvind Gupta v. Headstrong, Inc., et al.
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure contract-law employment-law h1b-visa immigration-law nonimmigrant-worker settlement-agreement wage-and-hour wage-hour-violations
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Immigration
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether employers can have a legally enforceable private settlement and release agreement with the nonimmigrant worker in violation of 'INA ' requirements.
In the absence of any complaint, claim or counterclaim by employer for breach of contract by nonimmigrant worker, did the district court properly award attorneys ' fees to the employer.
Did Headstrong, Inc. comply with required wage obligations for the period of violations found by the Administrator (Wage-Hour) and the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether employers can have a legally enforceable private settlement and release agreement with the nonimmigrant worker in violation of INA requirements
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 7, 2022)
2022-03-23
Application (21A534) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until June 5, 2022.
2021-03-18
Application (21A534) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 6, 2022 to June 5, 2022, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Arvin Gupta
Arvind Gupta — Petitioner
Marty Walsh, Secretary of Labor
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent