No. 21-1499
Mahesh Ramchanndani v. Sunil Gahdhi, et al.
Tags: civil-rights discrimination due-process equal-protection federal-law federal-statute property-rights racial-discrimination security-deposit standing tenant-rights
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
Statement by Landlord in an email exhibit 001
Deal is Approved but being that their money is in India ,
I need 4 months deposit - 1 month of that will be first
month's rent.
Petitioner feels the law 42 U.S.C. § 1982 is violated,
and Judge Mendoza says no.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1982 for failure to state a claim
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-04-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 30, 2022)
Attorneys
Mahesh Ramchanndani
Mahesh Ramchanndani — Petitioner