No. 21-1498
Norman Bartsch Herterich v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: adjudication appellate-review constitutional-violations district-court-dismissal due-process federal-jurisdiction rooker-feldman rooker-feldman-doctrine state-court-proceedings
Latest Conference:
2022-11-18
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Rooker-Feldman doctrine bars federal district-court jurisdiction over an action merely because the action alleges Constitutional violations "arising from " state-court proceedings, where the claims presented to the federal district court have not been adjudicated by state courts.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Rooker-Feldman doctrine bars federal-district-court jurisdiction over an action merely because the action alleges Constitutional-violations arising-from state-court proceedings, where the claims presented to the federal-district-court have-not-been adjudicated-by state-courts
Docket Entries
2022-11-21
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-11-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
2022-10-24
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-07
Waiver of right of respondents The Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, et al. to respond filed.
2022-06-06
Waiver of right of respondent City and County of San Francisco to respond filed.
2022-05-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 30, 2022)
Attorneys
City and County of San Francisco
Kaitlyn Murphy — San Francisco City Attorney's Office, Respondent
Norman Bartsch Herterich
Norman Bartsch Herterich — Petitioner
The Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, et al.
Sharon M. Nagle — Bold, Polisner, Maddow, Nelson & Judson, Respondent