Stephen Loftis White v. Nicholas B. Cox, et al.
The Lower State Judicial Circuit Court proceeding
against this Petitioner lacks subject matter and
personal jurisdiction for the reasons below:
1. When the priority secured interest holder,
secured party creditor, and Holder-in-due-course asserts
his/her claim 's over a charged DEFENDANT that is
his Birth Certificate Trust Tradename, is there not
an estoppel of trial court action?
2. Whether unsworn statements by a Prosecutor
in open court at a jurisdictional challenge hearing
has any weight at all, or is it considered the Judge
ruling in favor of the prosecutor and violates the
"Acccardi Doctrine "?
3. Does the STATE OF FLORIDA have plenary
unlimited authority against a "transient foreigner "
and "stateless person " [as defined in 28 U.S.C.
§ 1332(d), 4 U.S.C. § 110 (d)]?
4. By what authority does the Prosecutor as
Trustee to close the account of the Corporate Fiction
have to NOT close the account of the Trust created
through the U.S. Strawman/Social Security Account
ENTITY, when all outstanding commercial charges
have been lawfully discharged?
5. During the collateral attack against Jurisdiction
as this Petitioner has done by his U.S. District Court
action against agents of the STATE OF FLORIDA
herein, was or is it the prosecutor 's duty and obligation
to provide ALL the facts that establish the court 's
personal jurisdiction against himself as a man, and
place them upon the record?
6. What authority does the Prosecutor have to
"charge " White; a living sentient being, when he has
filed and proven with authenticated documents (that
have never been sufficiently rebutted by sworn testi
mony), the clear distinction between the official
"corporate fiction " name charged on the Charging
Instrument?
7. What authority does the STATE OF FLORIDA 'S
Court 's have to prosecute a court case that has been
discharged by the Appellant 's lawful and appropriate
commercial redemption remedy?
Whether the lower court had subject-matter and personal jurisdiction over the petitioner