No. 21-1444
Dolgen California, LLC v. Tricia Galarsa
Tags: bilateral-arbitration employment-law federal-arbitration-act individual-arbitration iskanian-rule preemption private-attorneys-general-act representative-claims
Key Terms:
Arbitration ClassAction
Arbitration ClassAction
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
The question presented is: Does the FAA require enforcement of a bilateral arbitration agreement providing that an employee cannot assert representative claims, including under PAGA?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the FAA require enforcement of a bilateral arbitration agreement providing that an employee cannot assert representative claims, including under PAGA?
Docket Entries
2022-11-04
Judgment and mandate issued.
2022-10-03
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>Viking River Cruises, Inc.</i> v. <i>Moriana</i>, 596 U. S. ___ (2022).
2022-08-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-15
Brief of respondent Tricia Galarsa in opposition filed.
2022-05-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 15, 2022.
2022-05-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 15, 2022 to July 15, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-05-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 15, 2022)
Attorneys
Dolgen California, LLC
Matthew Allen Fitzgerald — McGuireWoods LLP, Petitioner
Tricia Galarsa
Glenn Ari Danas — Clarkson Law Firm, P.C., Respondent