No. 21-1442

In Re Adriano Kruel Budri

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2022-05-16
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: appellate-procedure brief-dismissal civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process fifth-circuit judicial-discretion pro-se pro-se-litigation timely-filing
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)

Did the Panel of the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ("Fifth Circuit ") err by dismissing for want to prosecution a pending Appellant 's Opening Brief filed in a timely manner on 01/07/2022, and severely harming the constitutional rights of the Appellant as Pro Se and to remediate the default in a timely manner found?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit err by dismissing for want of prosecution a pending Appellant's Opening Brief filed in a timely manner on 01/07/2022, and severely harming the constitutional rights of the Appellant as Pro Se and to remediate the default in a timely manner found?

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-15
Brief of respondent FirstFleet, Inc. in opposition filed.
2022-05-12
Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due June 15, 2022)

Attorneys

FirstFleet, Inc.
Charles Eric StevensLittler Mendelson, P.C., Respondent
In Re Adriano Kruel Budri
Adriano Kruel Budri — Petitioner