Tamia Banks, et al. v. Cotter Corporation, et al.
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Jurisdiction
The first question presented is whether there has
been a "nuclear incident" such that the Price Anderson Act is applicable and provides original jurisdiction when the Congressional compensation mechanism provided by the Price Anderson Act is not implicated by the conduct giving rise to a Plaintiffs
claims.
The second question presented is whether an order by a federal district court severing a primary
claim from a related contribution claim, remanding
the primary claim to state court, and keeping federal
jurisdiction over the contribution claim constitutes a
"final decision" under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Whether there has been a 'nuclear incident' such that the Price Anderson Act is applicable and provides original jurisdiction when the Congressional compensation mechanism provided by the Price Anderson Act is not implicated by the conduct giving rise to a Plaintiffs claims